Philosophizing neural

Philosophizing neural is elicit of [could be of an illicit] what is experienced by cognizant incoherent to visualizing of forms; merely a scheme to contradict common sense and habitual propensity; to fathom the invisible apparition of thought. There is an infinitesimally of truth in it but in most instances is brain twisting abstracts and speculations which are not even to be classified as knowing. Not a single explanation from the antiquity to this modern era is thereby to be jotted as reliable in whatever sense was or is hypothesized. The more U tries to delve into the subtle or the deep, the topsy-turvy and gag are mounting to a steep path. No word or term is sanguinely illegible to procure a tint of an elaborated aftermath. In dealing with this endless problem, neural philosophy seems to be baulked by an impregnable obstacle to its progress. And U can’t even believe a minuscule from the telling. There is no spot at which criticism can stop.

Life is not founded on science or word. Anywhere, there is no Science, but only signs. The generality of science is a proud fiction or a gorgeous dream, variously told and interpreted according to the varying interest and proclivity of the aesthetic. Life is but “under the pressure of necessity” and it has no relation to whatsoever proclamation or conceptual.

It traces the steps of that growth by which what was no better than a fragment of nature—an intelligence located (as it seemed to humanoid but never figurative/metaphorical by the brutes and other existences) in one piece of matter—comes to realize the truth of it and of self. The ape, if it could speak will ask; ‘how could a humanoid is bloody sure that grey matter is thinking’? The cognizant is meant to experience of conceiving which probability may not be attributing of the brainy meat? When U is sleeping does U use its brain? Where are the forms U saw before U sleep gone and the brain is still in the head whilst U is deep sleeping; why could not the brain thinks as what it did before sleep. Where is the brain of a tree when it is searching nourishment? The sun and the moon are shinning and own luminous; do they use brain? The quizzes may sound stupid to many. This is a kind of torment of supposing is so dreading.

U categorize humanoid with brain and non-humanoid is without brain; U therefore is responsible for the survival of the non-humanoid. U seems to hold the skeptical principal that only with brain will survive. With head does not define the head is utilized to think or sieve ideas. The head is merely a part of parts of an inert machine as it needs a driver to be mobilized. The driver must impulses or impels the machine to active as the machine is brainless instrument.

The idea – god- existence is never to be elucidated or touched. Let it be on its own course as a reverence to its pristine; U is an atheist in disguise.